I know that we can brute force it by placing an obstacle at every valid position in the path, but is there a more elegant / efficient solution?

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Ohh that is helpful, yeah, i don’t know how I’d get these counted. This is probably the ones I’m missing. The way I’ve been thinking about it is that all a loop is is a rectangle. So basically each guard’s turn is a corner of a rectangle. By taking opposite corners (every other turn the guard makes) we can see if we can draw a full rectangle without hitting any walls. If we can, then that would make a loop.

    A few things I figured out playing with this:

    • You need to pay attention to the rotation rule of the guard. Taking any random rotation points won’t take the guards rotation into effect and will result in false positives.
    • Thinking about the rectangle visualization, since you’re only trying to test opposite corners, you only need to compare one turn and turn + 2 to see if they finish the rectangle.

    So maybe the logic would be to ignore the rotations in part one when the guard walks unobstructed, and do a pass through the whole map and mark each point of a possible rotation, and then drawing possible rectangles where 3 corners exist, to find an obstruction point. Then you can check if the obstruction point is in the set of steps the guard made in part 1 when unobstructed. Still though, I think this doesn’t take into account the guards rotation, so will probably be wrong.

    • lwhjp@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Rectangles don’t account for all loops though, right? Couldn’t you have a loop with, say, 6 points in an L shape?

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah you’re right. I keep focusing on the smaller example where everything is just rectangle loops, but the big map is way more complex. I do wonder though if an L shaped loop is just multiple rectangle loops combined though? Like if you can find all the rectangles, then find ones where combined they make bigger loops?

        • lwhjp@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I mean, sure you can combine rectangles to make any path, but since there is no upper limit I don’t think that will help much. You may be on to something and I just can’t see it, though! Good luck!