• Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, and he went away not because they voted him out but thanks to Soviet weapons.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Soviets were the only ones who truly supported the Spanish democracy against the fascist. Every other country, including Poland, turned their back to us while the Luffwaffle was bombing our citizens.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Soviets were the only ones who truly supported the Spanish democracy against the fascist.

          Curious that their backstabbing the Spanish republicans was instrumental in losing the Spanish Civil War for the republican side. Strange kind of support.

          • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            What kind of propaganda are you reading in which sending weapons, planes and officers (while all the other countries did NOTHING) is backstabbing.

            Spain democracy lost because the allied powers did not care about us the same way the cared about Poland.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              You’re on Divide By Zero, you should be fucking familiar with how they fucked the anarchists and the Trots, and that most of their ‘aid’ was purchased, not given.

              • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I’m friends with everyone leftist, even if they hate each other. I can feel comfortable among anarchist, tankies, socdems, new age leftists, reformist, etc. Because I know what our common objective is and I just can’t care about the subtle differences. So I know the anarchist side of the story as well as I know the tankie side.

                Being myself an active member of the social movement in my country and actually having watched modern day anarchist working with modern day communists I can say without any doubts that no version is true. Probably both starting arguing about stupid shit, and actual personal problems disguised as political problems, when they should had focused on the real enemy. But anyway I’m thankful for ALL who fought against fascism in Spain, anarchist, communist, republicans… I thank the international brigades, I thank orwell and I thank the soviets and stalinist. They all put their lives on line to stop fascism.

                I just despise such an unproductive and harmful division of the left for shit that just does not matter when the true enemy is so big. And sometimes I just see a lust for internal division and eternal losing in such behavior. I don’t know how some leftists have energy left to hate each other after they should had used that energy to fight the true enemy, capitalism and fascism. And I say this for any anarchist who hates tankies and any tankie who hates anarchists. You are not enemies, the enemy is in other direction.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Because I know what our common objective is and I just can’t care about the subtle differences.

                  Even when those ‘subtle differences’ result in being backstabbed and sold out and the entire cause being lost against a fascist enemy, great. Subtle little differences, like “We need to purge the anarchists and Trots” should be met with “We need complete and total cooperation with the people who want to purge us 😊”

                  The true meaning of a united front, huh?

                  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    As I said I have actually worked a lot in environments with a diverse leftist spectrum.

                    And in my experience backstabbing usually goes both ways and is a result of the previous hate (and a lot of the time because personal non political issues) not the other way around.

                    And yes. The only wins I’ve seen is when there have been total cooperation. Division is always the prelude of defeat.

                    And be ensure that I would be saying exactly the same words to any tankie who talks about “purging any leftist” no matter what their ridiculous arguments are for such a premise. I’ve heard it all and it is often just as untrue.

          • Heartwotalk@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Homage to Catalonia by George Orwell would also be a good read for someone looking favorably on the Soviets during the Spanish Civil War.

              • lugal@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                He was radicalized against the Soviets because they did not support the socialist revolution led by anarchosyndicalists. Instead Stalin supported the liberals because he said it wasn’t time for revolution yet which is BS since Barcelona and big parts of Catalonia did well under anarchists. An anarchist revolution would undermine the “ends justify the means” and “there is no other way to socialism than ours” rhetoric of the bolsheviks.

                TLDR He was an anti-Soviet agitator but from the left

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  He was radicalized against the Soviets because they did not support the socialist revolution

                  Was this before or after he served as a British intelligence officer in colonial-era Burma?

                  • lugal@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    It was after. That also radicalized him towards class solidarity and socialism. He empathized with the suppressed indigenous peoples there and in the next step with the suppressed in his own country. He went to meet them and live with them as documented in his book The Road to Wigan Pier. Then, as a vaguely socialist, he went to Spain as documented in Homage to Catalonia. I read both books btw

        • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          East Germany paid war reparations to the Soviets while rebuilding itself into an industrial powerhouse - the people who “stole most of East Germany’s infrastructure” were the West German capitalists after reunification, when the whole region was forcibly de-industrialized and left a shadow of its former self that still hasn’t fully recovered over thirty years later.

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        6 months ago

        As did everyone. There’s no study showing that the amount of rapes per soldier by the soviets is higher than that of other nations.

        • el_bhm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh fuuuuck of. There are books based on actual KGB archives that were opened up. Rape of Berlin is well described. There are books about the actual bordelos attached to armies. Western armies. Soviet officers had army wives. Apparently they still do.

          There are countless accounts of people prefering Nazi soldiers to soviets. It is THE reason central and easter Europe hates russia.

          No data on rapes my ass. But pleeenty of data that soviets single handedly saved the world from Nazis.

          Get a grasp.

          • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            6 months ago

            Wow, so the released KGB archives show the tapes. I wonder what would happen if the Americans or the English did that too!

            Hatred of Russians by eastern Europeans is due to 30+ years of anti-communist propaganda. The fact that poles hate the USSR which liberated more than the very Nazis who genocided millions of them, shows this. And it wasn’t the case 40 years ago.

            Polls in France after WW2 showed 70%+ of people saying it was the USSR who saved them from Nazism. Nowadays, it’s 70% Americans. That’s what Hollywood and propaganda do.

                  • el_bhm@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    No, you see, your grandparents did not encounter both Nazis and soviets. Your parents did not live under communist rule. And most of all you cannot even pin point results of current day ramifications of: 1. Occupation period, 2. Communism.

                    Totally, propaganda. It is sooo good that they even brainwashed your parents into thinking like they lived in bad communist state. It is so good it feels like there is a rift between generations.

                    Totally. And would not you know, they also did that in the Baltics and Czech.

                  • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I can see it in my browser and my phone, but sure. It’s a poll showing how in 1945, 55% of French people claimed the USSR freed them from Nazism. In 2015 it’s 25%. That’s exactly propaganda.

                    When you are ready to spend 10% of the time you spend shitting on communism and the USSR, actually shitting on the Nazism which carried out actual genocide in your country, I’ll be ready to talk with you. I’m sorry that the Polish foundational myth is based on Russophobia and anti-communism, it’s impossible to have meaningful discussions of 20th century socialism with most polish people.

        • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          We do know however that the Red Army had the most investigations of and prosecutions of rapists, so it’s a bit of a “Swedish rape crisis” problem where they look worse on paper than other countries simply because their record keeping of the crime in question is better.

          • el_bhm@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Oh, boy. Good that soviets took such good care of recording rapes. Unlike bad western nazies. White washing soviet rapes with statistics.

            There is also one more reason. soviets had no bordelos for the regular army. Only officers had army wives. It is a known fact. So what would regular grunts would do is rape anything they find.

            But probably western propaganda. Because in communism, everyone is equal, and everything belongs to everyone.

            Like in current day russia.

        • el_bhm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I will let you know that you constantly excuse and support ultracapitalist nazi regimes. That makes you a nazi.

          • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            What’s your point? Every rape is to be condemned and prosecuted. What isn’t fair is making up claims about the amount of rapes by a certain demographic and not backing that up with extensive evidence. That exactly what racist people do against immigrants, and that’s what Nazis did against soviets.

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Imagine thinking the Russian cowards were the main factor in Hitler’s loss 😂😂😂