• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    “All I want to do is exploit struggling people for far more than my property is worth. Is that so wrong?!”

    • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even more ironic is that the “professional” landlords/property holding companies hire property managers who do literally all the work, including both the upkeep for the house and interaction with the tenants. Like, what exactly do you contribute at that point? What would change practically if I hired the property manager directly with the money I would be paying you? Especially when the most common pro-landlord argument (used by landlords themselves) is that they fix things around the house and maintain it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “You expect me to unclog a toilet?!”

        Yes. That’s exactly what I expect a landlord to do. And if you don’t live in the same city as your rental property, maybe that shouldn’t be allowed.

        • Bread@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am against landlords like everyone else, but I draw the line at unclogging the toilet. It isn’t worth the effort to report that and I don’t need people unnecessarily seeing my shit in the literal sense. Provided that it is a standard clog and not something wrong with the toilet.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not talking standard clog. I don’t mind using a plunger. But sometimes you need more than that and they should either do it or spend their own money on a plumber ASAP.

            • Bread@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah, I see. The Super Poo, the Toilet Destroyer, HAZMAT. Things that only a professional can do. Sometimes the rabbit doesn’t come out of the hat and you need an extra hand.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had a landlord who wrote into the original version of the lease that I (as the tenant) would be responsible for any needed repairs to the sewer system. This was a much more extreme version of being unwilling to unclog a toilet lol. I said fuck that noise and he took the clause out. He turned out to be a good landlord and he didn’t raise my rent once in seven years, but his tendency to just try and get away with whatever he could in the lease had me a bit worried at the start.

      • KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        For individuals who own like a single rental property as an investment property, you could blame the banks. Maybe the tenants don’t have the 20% the bank would require for a mortgage. But they can afford the monthly rent for the larger house rather than a smaller apartment. Also the landlord takes on the risk here. (Market value, no Rent payment, property damage, maintenance…)

        • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They take on the risk? That’s hysterical. Landlords don’t risk market value. They buy up all the houses when they’re cheap, make their money back and then some by renting the property, then make even more money when the housing market goes up and they kick the tenant out to sell the property. They don’t risk property damage, that’s the entire point of a security deposit. They don’t “risk” maintenance, that’s called doing their job.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Australia its way more common for landlords to use propert management companies.

        They charge about 5%, the tenant rings them and says “The hot water is out” they ring me and say “You need to authorise us to send a plumber” I say “Ok” they ring one of their go-to plumbers who attends super fast because they dont want to lose the repeat business of a property manager who has 100 properties to look after and they fix it at a fair rate because if they dont the property manager will find a new plumber.

        When I was renting out my first house (had to move for work for a few years) I couldnt get an electrician for my own house as fast and as cheap as my property manager could get one for my tenants.

  • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Fix my AC!”

    Particularly ironic that this is being framed as “unreasonable” because landlords themselves directly argue that their upkeep of the house justifies the significant upcharge they take from tenants. Like, even if we argued that landlord as a career is 100% acceptable and valid, that would literally be your job, would be like a professional chef complaining about people saying “make me food!”

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Had a cook who literally complained about receiving too many different kinds of orders and the customers were not even in a hurry

    • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had a rentoid that would call me for the most insane shit all the time. Changing light bulbs, fixing their own personal AC unit and stopping a neibourhood dog from barking.

      When they were evicted I held the damage deposit because the hardwood floors and internal doors were damaged to fuck by their dog which they tried to claim as being normal wear and tear.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds rough man. Maybe you should just sell the property, then you wouldn’t have to deal with such things.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I own my house, doesn’t mean I can’t see landlords are leaches that are screwing the housing market.

            • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Anyone who owns a home is a landlord by definition. You’re a lord of alloted land.

              It’s silly that you believe that landlords are the problem. The housing crisis is 100% Chinese, Arab and Large buisness investors.

              You’re the type that talks about the environmental impact of the people when 80% of pollution comes from a single source.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anyone who owns a home is a landlord by definition.

                I suppose if you completely fail to understand context sure, but why would I bother trying to have a discussion with someone who fails to understand basic context?

                The housing crisis is 100% Chinese, Arab and Large buisness investors.

                And what are these investors doing? Are they perhaps being landlords and renting out the property?

        • Sarmyth@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And they’re paying the bank, income tax, and property taxes. It’s not just free money. Slumlords exist, but the post doesn’t stop at slumlords and references landlords in general, which opens it up to fair criticism from much more of the populace that may just own 2-3 houses. Unless you’ve owned and maintained the house for over a decade, you wouldn’t profit from renting it it many areas. It’s mostly just paying bills while you hope the value goes up.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, people here are generally young and have only had experience being on the tenant side of the equation. Someday they may find out what it is like being on the other side and that tenants can be pigs.

        • Hyperi0n@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They may be good tenants and assume that most tenants are good tenants. Not realizing how rare that is.

          Then you also have the ones who say every landlord is bad, which is clearly them just being a bad tenant.

          I put my rent fairly low to help people out but the low income people are generally disasters to rent to.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bad renters exist, but for every story like yours I have five places I’ve lived in where it took months to fix the A/C in summertime and the landlord just let it fucking go meanwhile holding out their greedy mitts demanding $2000 a month.

        2 grand! To live in 90° heat, if I wanted to do that I’d just live on the street.

        Fucking landloids.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          demanding $2000 a month.

          Could be very reasonable or even cheap depending on location.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Does cheap mean they’re allowed to not fulfill their maintenance requirements meanwhile showing up on the dot collection day to take rent?

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        the alternative is that I don’t rent out part of my house and then there will be less housing

        This is only part of it. The “housing shortage” exists not because there aren’t enough homes, but that there are not enough homes on the market. Truthfully, renting out a spare bedroom is not the focus of people’s ire (though through a certain lens it is still a problem, but I won’t go into it here). The problem is that rent seekers are pricing people out of the housing market, which is creating higher demand for rentals, which drives up the market price, ect. It’s a systemic problem, and not necessarily one of individual culpability. Another part of the problem is the commodification of homes: any action taken to address home affordability will necessarily drive down home values (they are the same thing, after all), and many people depend on the value of their home not dropping. It’s a bubble with millions of people at risk of loosing their homes if it pops.

        There’s this convenient assumption for landlords that the rental market is full of people who simply want to be renters, or full of people who simply can’t afford to purchase their own home (usually by some moral failing), when the reality is that rent seekers are creating the problem that they claim to be solving. Houses wouldn’t be so expensive if there weren’t so many people buying houses for the purpose of renting out.

        All these cucks can blow me.

        Of course, there are other reasons why people might be angry with landlords.

      • rifugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or all these people are fucking idiots who are just obsessed with labels and culture wars.

        New here?

      • WaterChi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well that’s rather snowflakey… if you aren’t part of the problem why are you identifying with them?

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The idea that ALL landlords are exploiting ALL tenants ALL of the time is just so fucking stupid it’s hard to listen to. Goods and services cost money, idk why that is such a hard concept to grasp. I lean left and will probably never vote R for the rest of my life, but it’s hard to listen to people like that who have no understanding of basic economics.

      • WhipTheLlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Landlords must exist because people need to rent housing, and it sure sounds like you’re doing it right. Some landlords (and some tenants) are awful human beings who should not be landlords while others are good people.

        A bigger problem is happening in areas with housing shortages. Housing prices have been skyrocketing for 10+ years and home owners have been leveraging themselves with their home equity to buy other homes. On a large scale, that eats up a lot of housing supply, increases prices, and makes it more difficult for people without existing real estate equity to buy a house.

        In the city where I live, owning a house is essentially not possible for middle-class people unless their parents give them a down payment. Even my girlfriend and I, who combine for more than triple the average household income in the city, are taking years and years to save for a $300k+ down payment that’s needed to bring the mortgage payment down to $6k/mo.

        Landlords didn’t create the housing shortage, but I can see why someone who’s struggling to buy a house while watching landlords buy multiple houses can develop a hatred for them.

        • Numpty@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel this so much. I own a property. I rented it out. I ran into that exact same lineup of expenses vs income you note here and… I ended up taking my house OFF the rental market. It’s just not worth it.

          I keep getting into these discussions with people who yell “It’s immoral to buy a house and rent it out. Landlords must provide housing for renters at a loss so I can have cheap housing” and then… “It’s an investment and you as the owner must fund my low cost housing because you might earn equity in the property when you sell it in the future.”

    • Skabb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can also tell by her anorexic physique that she’s no landchad. No fridge raiding happening here.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My old landlord refused to fix our water heater, the leaking roof causing mould and water damage, the outlets that were falling off, the broken light switches that didn’t work, the ceiling light that was flickering and and literally hanging by the wires. All for $2000/month + utilities. Then he kicked us out because he wanted to sell the place, but now he can’t sell it because no bank will touch it with the amount of water damage it has lmao.

    Oh ya, can’t forget the 5 times he’s banged on our door threatening us with his lawyer because he stole $100 from us, we asked for it back, but he refused to answer our calls, so we had to wait 12 fucking months before our lease was up and we started paying month to month for us to subtract the $100 he owed us for 12 months from the payment.

  • Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel so bad for mine I’ve raised the amount I tip them every month from ~12% to 20%. You should, too - they struggle so hard.

    (Lol)

    • Koala@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because I love my landlord so much I only communicate with him through my lawyer to make extra sure every letter is worded really nicely and politely, much more polite than anything I would every write him. Also got him two very nicely worded court orders by know he would’ve missed out on if it wasn’t for me.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s an option that is actively being removed by massive firms. Empty houses are common, but available houses are few and affordable available houses are very rare.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can’t. Rich assholes and massive firms are buying them at insane prices so they can rent them out at double what a mortgage would cost. And that drives more people to apartments which drives their prices up.

        There’s a housing shortage in my area, and 30 percent of houses are empty. But if you jack up the rent enough, you make more money off those that can pay the ransom than you would by lowering the rent to get all units rented. It’s an artificial scarcity created by landlords.

        I work in municipal development and literally every single-family project that’s approached the city in the last 18 months is for rental only, because they figured out that mortgages don’t go up and eventually end, so why sell the houses at all?

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re a troll right? Because I refuse to belive anyone could genuinely be this clueless.

        • Skelectrician@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You make use of someone’s services, you pay for it. If you hate landlords, don’t indebt yourself to landlords. I started off with nothing, now I’m a homeowner.

          If I’m so fucking clueless, how come I have a mortgage and you don’t?

          • elephantium@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Where did you live before you bought your house?

            Is that approach available to 40-something single parents working at McDonald’s?

            • Skelectrician@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I lived in a basement suite, followed by a dump of an old house, before I found a slightly less dumpy old house to purchase in a rural area that most city folk would absolutely hate. This was all before the age of 20. Sold my old house about 7 or 8 years later to a younger man who had a very similar starting plan.

              Now I have a 5 bedroom house on two acres. It’s not in some heavily populated area, it’s out in the country and it’s affordable.

              Anyway, if you’re a single parent over 40 working at McDonald’s, you’ve made far too many bad decisions in life for me to be of any help.

              • elephantium@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                How did you buy the basement suite? Or did you rent it? Almost nobody graduates high school with enough cash to buy a house, so…

                far too many bad decisions

                Hard disagree. I work as a programmer which pays well enough to be comfortable. The work doesn’t suit everyone, and even if it did, we need people doing other things than programming for the world to work! That includes fast food, retail, etc. The cliche is teenagers and college kids, but in fact over half of people making minimum wage are older.

                That includes a lot of single parents – spouse left, now they have to scramble for income even before child support kicks in. They’re not all just jackasses you can dismiss with “bah, they made their bed”.

                My problem with your advice to “just buy a house” is that it’s not actionable for at least half the population.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your know, I guess experiences vary widely, but the landlords I know don’t fit all the hate. For instance, one of my employees decided to rent her house instead of selling it when her family needed a bigger one. They’ve been renting to the same family for a decade or more without ever raising the rent. The family could not afford to buy any house, let alone the one they’re in, so renting allows them to live in a kind of place they couldn’t afford otherwise. My employee has let them skip rent a few times when times were hard.

    I know a few similar stories. Maybe it’s different with people who own apartment buildings or whatever, but I just don’t see being a landlord as inherently bad. Like anything else, you can do it ethically or unethically.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, for sure - I live in southern California, which has about as high a cost of real estate as you’re going to find, but that isn’t caused by landlords. I mean, if you bought a new car and were selling your old one, you’d probably sell it for whatever the market would pay, right? Maybe if you’re really well off you’d just give it to someone, but most of us are going to sell for the going rate. It’s the same with houses. If I can easily get $500k for my house, I’m not going to list it for $400k just to be nice - I could use the money.

        Do people feel like it’s inherently more laudable to sell their house than to rent it? It seems like, as long as they’re not gouging, they’re doing more of a service by renting to people who can’t afford to buy, and also covering all the costs of repairs and risk of damage that renters don’t have to worry about.

        I just don’t get the hate broadly, though the management company who ran my daughter’s apartment complex were assholes.

        • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I work in a real estate adjacent field, part of the housing issue IS very much because of big companies and people just buying up all the houses to rent them for passive income.

          I don’t care if people have 2 or 3 houses but when they own 8 or 9 or hundreds then yea we have an issue.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I agree a hundred percent. In every business, it’s possible to be predatory. Big companies are doing some really shitty things, and we should try to figure out how to stop that.

            But some people are saying that being a landlord is inherently unethical - the moment someone rents a property, they’re a vile leach. I just think that’s wrong.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My last land lord raised rent by 2.5x after the first year. When we moved out he kept the full security deposit because “the inside of the oven was dirty”

      Your mileage may vary

      • Lyricism6055@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        4 beautiful words that worked wonders with my shitty landlord who tried to keep my deposit “normal wear and tear”.

        As soon as I stated that, the lady changed her tune completely.

      • gerryflap@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your landlord is allowed to raise it by that much? I’m Dutch and we have limits on how much rent can increase, which was a maximum of 4.1% in 2023.

    • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a land lord, did exactly what people say we all did. 15 years ago I bought two 200k homes for 30k each… they are an income plan for my kids so they don’t have to necessarily worry about taking a better paying job instead of something they want to do. Probably a little naive now. But I run the houses at a bare minimum profit just so the government won’t come after me due running a loss on my taxes. I have raised rent only enough to do that. I pay for a property management firm to take care of the properties so that the tenants have 24 hour response to issues. I’ve had the same tenants for 12 years in both properties. Every 4 years or so I have one of the rooms that the tenants want renovated. It’s a right off so doesn’t costa fortune ava the house gets slowly updated. Not every landlord is an asshole. Some of us play the long game without screwing people. But I realize that I am part of the problem. I am part of the reason for less supply in the market. But selling my properties will make my children’s lives less secure and I’m not willing to do that. So i do partially deserve some of the blame.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see you having any blame. Supply and demand for housing includes everything, including rentals. You would be part of the problem if you bought those places and left them empty as vacation spots or something. You didn’t, you’re supplying them to people who I’m guessing wouldn’t be able to buy them themselves. You’re not driving up the cost of housing. I’d argue that, since you’re charging less than you could, you’re actually lowering it.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          He literally is driving up the cost of housing. Rental markets are quite seperate to the actual housing market and people who own 3 houses, drive up the cost of buying a house. There is a good chance they can’t afford to rent, yes, but only because of people like him buying housing they dint need to make a profit, they can afford the rent, so they would also He able to afford the mortgage for it if given the chance.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        How the heck did you find not one but two 200k houses for 30k? Or are you saying you bought them for 30k and now they’re worth 200k? Either way holy balls I wish I could do either of those lol

        • greendakota99@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I assumed they meant they were just worth $30k when they bought them. That is a pipe dream that probably won’t happen again in any of our lifetimes.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This shows one of the most common things landlords tell themselves to justify it.

        But I run the houses at a bare minimum profit

        You tell yourself this, to make you feel better, but you don’t acknowledge that almost all the money your tenants pay you is profit, since they are paying for the mortgage. Even if you rented at 0 immediate profit, for the entire time until you paid off the houses, you would have actually made 1.2million in profit, since you now own 2 houses at 600k each.

        And those families, instead of paying a mortgage and ending with hundreds of thousands of dollars in equity, that they could refinance, or use to buy a better house or leave as inheritance for their kids, now have nothing, as all that money has gone to you.

        There is no such thing as an ethical landlord. Even the “”“good”“” ones are still exploring people’s basic need for shelter to make them rich.

        If you really wanted to be a “good” landlord offer those families the chance to buy the house with the 15 years of down payments they already made to you to start it off. But as you said they’re an “income plan” for your kids I don’t think you would do that.

        • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, I get what you’re saying. And perhaps if my financial situation was better I could consider the option to offer the houses to the tenants. But as you suspect I will not trade my children’s financial security just to be charitable. The rent I charge is 30%-40% below market value. I suspect if you were in my position you wouldn’t be so inclined to give away your wealth either.

          • gmtom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was in your position, when my grandparents died I inherited a house, that people encouraged me to rent out. Instead I sold it and invested the money (specifically into a green energy fund.) As that way I still have my financial security, without being a landlord.

                • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because to start with, I invested and risked my own money a much less bubbled deal estate market with a significant amount of my available capital. You invested someone else’s money. I took all the risk, and you want me to give away all the profits from that risk. Even your “green” investments take advantage of workers, buy off shore parts, cost people their jobs. Why don’t you donate all your profits to those people. Your entire argument is so steeped in hypocrisy that it’s hard to even know if you’re not just a troll.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’s different with people who own apartment buildings or whatever

      Yes. My landlord is literally a corporation.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t matter either way. My landlord is an asshole who never fixes anything he says he will (even things he’s legally supposed to.) Can’t use the law against him because he’s allowed to raise the rent any time he wants with a few simple changes to our lease.

        I’ve never had a good landlord. Most of them are greedy trash.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the whole “not all cops are bad a guy I know is a cop and he’s nice” argument just for landlords.

      Or you could phrase it about slave owners “my freind owns slaves, but he just owns the one and he treats them really well!”

      Landlording is inherently immoral and explotative, not matter hoe “”“ethical”“” the landlord is.

    • borscht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk I feel like there’s also something to be said to have the freedom to just buy another house after saving a bit. It sounds so easy, but most families would have to sell their house in order to upsize.

      Never moved but my mom was in credit unions and the trade in of the house was pretty common. In all fairness, there were many “multiple apartment complex owners” at that same CU, they were notably colder and exclusively about numbers (i.e. throwing a fit and sending another appraiser to their barely functional building to get a dozen k).

  • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ours put our rent up 25% so just because I was upset I paid this month’s rent a week late and they were complaining they needed the money to pay their montgage… Bitch please I don’t wanna hear about your financial problems

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They need your money to pay their mortgage. Looks like you are paying for their house. I guess it’s one thing if that house is entirely occupied by you, but I’ve had this very same situation where I’m renting their basement yet paying $1300 (which was actually more than their mortgage)

      It’s so fucking disgusting and insulting to not only not be able to afford your own home because of all this b.s, but to also be paying for someone else’s home…

  • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I run a small senior living complex in a rural town. We have the cheapest rent in town. We scrape by, trying to make improvements here and there. They are maintained though. We seriously charge hundreds of dollars less than the next closest complex in the area. We refused to raise our rent in the past 4 years dispite rising taxes and utility bills. Most our tenants are widows/widowers living off a fixed income. We are either too nice or bad business owners because that “fix my AC” One always stings and reaches into my personal budget. And by “personal budget” I mean I eat ramen for a couple weeks.

    Anyway, I actually feel like this meme. Other than my tenants are usually happy. Occasionally we get someone who is just never happy no matter what you do. I know all the other complexes are owned by one company essentially creating a monopoly and they have exploited this town. We get calls from people crying because they will be homeless.

    • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For every one good landlord like you there’s 1mil slumlords that don’t think you even need AC, or think that black mould isnt a health hazard.

      Bless you.

      • phx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tenants deserve to live in house conditions that the landlords themselves would be willing to live in.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the model of housing as a business that is the problem, no matter how benevolent an operator may try to be. The market is designed to eliminate you as competition and reward the exploitative monopolistic company.

      More importantly is whether or not you are or would ever act as a firewall against competing (or at this point any) housing development.

      Like if a subsidized public housing for seniors opened up next door to your complex offering rates at or below your own: would you support it given this persistent at risk population?

      • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We would support it. We only have 24 units, we field at least 50 calls a day. We would be fine. We have turned down an offer from the company that owns the other complexes. The offer was 3 times what we paid 10 years ago and had a few more zeros on the end of what we still owe. But these tenants have become family. Also from a business owner perspective I would rather have this steady income than the BS of a quick payday then having to reinvest somewhere else and work are butts off to get that sustainable without turning into a scumbag landlord. Landlording is easy if you charge exorbitant prices and pay people to do everything. We do all the work ourselves to keep the cost down. Meanwhile I work another full time job. So does my wife and we have two kids. I don’t have time to get another property to this point of sustainability.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a landlord. I’m priced WELL below the market because my tenant is state patrol and is a great guy and a good family. I haven’t raised his rent ever. I will raise it when my HOA goes up next year, but that’s only to help cover my fees. If keep the rent so I can pick the right renters that is compatible with me. I rather have a good renter than a few bucks more a month.

    • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the real test is if you give their deposit back. I’ve never gotten my deposit back without a fight, even after cleaning the apartment top-to-bottom. That’s why I always take photos before leaving.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shit my place was in better condition when I left than the way it was when moved in and they still wouldn’t give the deposit back.

        Free market doesn’t work quite so well when it’s a required item like housing or medical.

    • Fraeco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the way!

      My previous landlord was like this. Lived there 4 years, rent never went up. We left the place like we found it (which was pristine).

    • OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just bc you are a great landlord doesn’t mean anyone should be able to hold such power over anyone. Not to mention ownership of land is a human concept we can live without.

      • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention ownership of land is a human concept we can live without.

        How would you do it differently?

      • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        ‘Abolish ownership’ is a pretty simple talking point, how would you make it work in a legal sense?

        Who determines what is your responsibility vs the neighbor vs the city? How do you establish legal boundaries for purposes of theft, vandalism, or trespassing?

        Laws might seem cold (because they are) or inhumane (because they are) but they are also the thing that keeps society organized. And that makes them one of the most important human inventions. Rights are the result of laws.

        If you’re concerned about land prices, or people being ‘priced out’ of things, there are important alternate solutions to that kind of problem. Things like social services, improving education, breaking up super corporations, promoting healthy neighborhood design and small business, etc.

        • paradx@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think one main argument of people that take the ‘abolish ownership’ seriously don’t mean the concept of owning things you need and use, but the concept of claiming ownership of property that you DON’T use and use that as a way of enacting power over others. So I would say it wouldn’t be throwing people out of their homes but that owning property you are not using your self would not be legal. You could grab land or an empty house and it would be yours as long as you need it. Of cause this will not get rid of all the problems and conflict that already exists in some form now, but it doesn’t have to be total chaos and lawlessness.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t have power over my tenants. They have as much power as I do. They can leave and I can also ask him to leave.

        They have zero obligation to stay at my place.

        I have a space to rent and they need a place to live. It’s a business transaction that both parties benefit from.

    • pwalshj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re a bum. How dare you. You take money for nothing. You should let him live there for free. No one should own anything. I hate tipping. Fuck cars. I think that about covers it. :)