As we hear about the pagers in Lebanon that injured more than 2,700 people today, a reminder that one of the things that came out of the Ed Snowden leaks is that the NSA intercepts packages en route to customers to install malware and surveillance devices.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      If they can’t route a package with it being tampered with how am I supposed to trust their packets?

      • osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 months ago

        So, i started working for Cisco shortly after this went down, and it actually changed basically everything about their global supply chain. Anywhere that devices which would be provided to customers were at rest were blanketed by cameras and literally all procurement shipping was changed to overnight (or first overnight for anything near a warehouse) to try to make it functionally impossible to execute the same attack again.

        Talk shit about their products all you want, but they were unironically angry about this issue and in classic Cisco fashion threw money at the problem until it went away.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s awesome.

          I suspect there’s still ample opportunity for the NSA/etc (indeed any state actor) to interfere with shipping at almost any point and have disclosure that it happened be a crime.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, we knew that before Snowden. Story made me think of my uncle, RIP, who’s friend told him to “buy Cisco, trust me” back in the early '90s. So my uncle bought Sysco. He was pissed at himself until the day he died.