You extracted billions of years of stored energy from the ground and set it on fire over 50 years. Did you really think there weren’t any consequences?
You extracted billions of years of stored energy from the ground and set it on fire over 50 years. Did you really think there weren’t any consequences?
No recall needed. Bios update to fix the issue. If your cpu popped already then warranty it.
Ping me before you start.
you have to be an idiot to pay that much for something that locked down and unserviceable.
I have a raspberry pi as a print server but that’s about it. I tried a few distros on an old laptop but none really worked that well.
MS’s built-in security platform is top tier also. Some companies like alternative products.
You need to understand loss.
I agree and I am a lawyer, but not a meme lawyer.
OP is asking for school/work purposes.
Run windows as a vm on your Linux machine.
not energy, but def water. modern wash machines are extremely water efficient. That may result in energy savings if you’re using hot water. Modern detergent doesn’t really need hot water though.
Not perfect. I hate searching for a thing and someone has pasted a huge keyword dictionary into their post for SEO. It’s like when I was shopping specifically for a new Chevy spark r/t and the sales rep tried to steer me into a used Malibu.
That guy sucks.
What I really hate is when I search for a problem I’ve seen off and on for a few years and the search results is exactly the issue im experiencing.
Great!
Only to find out after chasing that link that it was me who posted that question, 4 years ago, and it’s still unanswered.
DNS doesn’t propagate fast enough.
Just like ipv4 though, you wouldn’t use external addresses internally because your external IPs might change, such as when moving between ISPs. You would NAT a hosts external address to its internal address.
What translates the public ip to the internal ip? Aren’t they different?
If you use a single shared public ip then you’re using some amount of address translation.
If you’re using an external ip address that’s different than an internal ip address but both are assigned to a single host the you’re doing 1:1 NAT.
At least that’s how I understand ipv4 and I don’t think ipv6 is much different.
Yes but you’d still be performing NAT. It’s at least 1:1.
You’ll need to deal with firewall rules regardless, and drop IPs into policies. IPv6 doesn’t remove any of those chores but gets rid of having to maintain tables to deal with many-to-one NAT.
Were any women involved in this? Seems like the industry was full of older white men making all of the decisions back then.