So I have to use the same width as you? What if I want 3 spaces for a tab?
So I have to use the same width as you? What if I want 3 spaces for a tab?
In those cases, I agree. But for a tiling window manager like w3m, I don’t see the application having a say in position and location. Hence I didn’t think that the app has so much to do with creating windows. Just my thought.
I used to do apps with QT (as well as with Java) and when creating a window, I only needed to say, “new window of that preferred size please”, then the engine would make the window of that size if possible. Now, maybe QT did things more in depth behind the scene, I don’t know.
I don’t understand what is the point of this. Isn’t it the job of the WM to position windows and stuff? Apps have to do it themself now?
Mine is not in the list.
“Click here and there, because no documentation…”
You don’t say if you noticed before pushing. If it’s your last commit and not pushed yet, you can still amend your last commit.
I am not sure what do you mean. I use fedora with Nvidia (it’s a different repo to activate) and my main rig is for gaming… No problem what so ever. Using Fedora since 37, what a smooth ride.
Nice! Looking quite good.
what the fuck else do you want?
Lol, maybe a max-width on body at least, so I don’t lose my line when reading long lines.
It’s said to have narrow lines helps readeability for a reason.
Although, I agree, you don’t need much to make a website that is functional.
Using the JIS layout. One thing I miss from ANSI is the single and double quotes on my right pinky.(on the same key) Other than that, JIS is a nice layout to do programing with.
That sample text file, you can save it in the “Template” folder in your home folder, and then you can create a new file from that template with the right click menu > new entry :)
Clojure, can’t stop using it, so fun to use!
Her is my take to try to help you.
If it’s your own code, you can add docstrings comments to your functions, so you don’t have to re-read the function body everytime. Also, name functions to be understandable more easily when possible.
If not your code, write on a piece of paper (not on computer) the in and out of a function, maybe like so:
[1,2,3] -> (sum function) -> 6
Then, you can even connect the functions together and see the whole algorithm:
[1,2,3] -> (sum) -> (multiplyBy2) -> (...) -> final_result
When projects get more complex, paper will not cut it, then some note taking app of some sort will help. (logseq could help, but some mind mapping or sequence diagram programs would help as well)
Also, I don’t know what language your are working with, but learning LISP (maybe clojure) could help.
Why? Because you have to connect your functions together, and it forces you to do so.
At first, it might be harder compared to what you’re used to, but it’ll give you better fundations to keep learing.
Looks nice, I’ll try it today and see how it goes. At least MS doing something good for a change…unless they added spyware to a font!? LOL
Some LISP going mainstream woulb be great!
Good on you to not have to maintain legacy code (15years+). Also, as a comparison, with JAVA, I have a legacy JAVA 1.5 to maintain, as far as you have the runtime, that stuff works, and that’s it. This is how it should be.
Serious Answer: PHP in itself is not that bad, despite some discussable decisions in function naming and arguments order to name a few. The biggest problem, is that it has a settings file describing how it works (php.ini) and that sh*t will bite you in the rear when you move apps from server to server, where all the libs are different etc… PHP never works out of the box when moving something on a new server, that is the worst part of the language.
Meanwhile in APL, you just 20 50 60 90, 10
Great list, but a couple could be added:
A URL is not an agent string, just saying.