Self-hosting doesn’t really fix anything, the developers can still control the program and read all your chats/calls.
No, you should have the freedom to use it if you want. All I’m saying is that you can’t really call TeamSpeak a better alternative, when they’re both just as bad (they’re both proprietary). If you’re looking for a better alternative, consider using Mumble, it’s FOSS.
I may not read the source code of every tool I use, but even if the average user doesn’t read the source code, having it available for inspection by others in the community increases security, trust, and overall software quality. All a user really has to do is look at the license of the software they use, typically a GPL or similar license, and consider how reputable it is. Not only that, but if you’re on Linux already, you can just get most of the software from your distro’s repositories.
So you’re just trusting them to not do anything bad?
If you can’t audit the source code of the program, how do you know if TeamSpeak isn’t malware?
They’re owned by a for-profit company, they collect data on you by default, they’ve already had privacy issues in the past, and they include non-free software by default. I would rather have a beginner start off with Debian or Trisquel. We shouldn’t be trapping people into these distros because then they’ll potentially get too comfortable and not make the switch. This is coming from someone who did start off on Ubuntu. Sure, it’s more convenient, but we should be teaching people to value freedom over convenience. Even if the data collection is minimal, it’s still data.
We don’t use open-source around here pardner.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html
OP and I*
I’ve never used Linux in my life
Acktually, it’s GNU/Linux, Linux is just the kernel :)
The errors went away at boot, but nothing happens now, its just stuck. I just see the _ blinking that’s it. Going to try installing Arch and see if I can get it working better.
Anything that’s cheap and reliable, nothing over $200
Why do I have to explain why I don’t want WiFi built-in? What difference would it make exactly?
Libreboot nowadays would most likely still contain blobs in the BIOS, but not as much as regular Coreboot. I don’t know why you’re being downvoted lol. If Coreboot is supported, they can port it to Libreboot.
If they added Coreboot support, I would buy it just because of that. (Not 100% FOSS, but it’s still nice to have more control over your hardware)
That’s what I ended up doing and it worked. I think I used like FreeDOS or something like that.
I mean I already get paid for the work I do, I make $55K/year currently. Should I be asking for more?
Thank you for the information!
I do have Libreboot on all my computers, my T1700 MT is currently Librebooted, that’s the server I’m planning on using this card with. I wonder, since the firmware is nearly entirely open, we can possibly support it then, no?