n5j1rl30rna0rc16crk5vgzkkn08821q-asciiquarium-1.1

ELDEN RING.desktop

Fuck Ticketmaster

Kitty has tabs

OpenWRT still relies on proprietary firmware for WiFi to work

WireGuard supports mesh as well, but it requires to manually configure all the keys and all the IPs on all devices.

There is wgsd, which supposedly makes WireGuard mesh networking easier, but I haven’t tried it.

Is this like Tailscale? Maybe closer to Headscale, as tinc seems to be completely self hosted.

I think the OP is looking for a decentralized alternative to something like Nord/Express/Mullvad to hide their traffic, and not a way to connect their devices together.

People can also use the Nix package manager on any distro, and run their apps using nix-shell, so that they don’t need to install as root.

Are people still buying Windows after the invention of KMSPico ?

There are big differences between Snaps and Flatpaks.

• both the flatpak server and the client are open source
• flatpak does not publish 3rd party apps, promoting them as verified (https://news.itsfoss.com/valve-steam-snap-ubuntu/)

I don’t agree that it made any sense to do that. If they wanted to containerize apps, there has been an open source solution to that for years; Flatpak.

ain’t nobody got time for that

As an app maintainer, that wants to support Ubuntu, why would I prefer to deploy a snap server, instead of publishing deb files, or creating a Flatpak?

I have Signal and microG with push notifications. Signal still uses websocket on my device. So, I guess it would be fine without microG push.

Baby don’t hurt me