In theory, yes. In practice, it’s a bit different. At the very least for now.
In theory, yes. In practice, it’s a bit different. At the very least for now.
You should be able to do that with a ublock origin filter.
Maybe ask on the community: !ublockorigin@lemmy.ml
Is the database of websites installed locally in the extension or is it calling home for every website I visit?
Let’s not build anything because there are no users. There are no users if we don’t build anything.
You can download videos and cut off sponsored moments in the video with sponsorblock.
GrayJay is pretty good!
Firefox’s implementation of manifest v3 doesn’t come with the same restriction as Google’s. Ad blockers will still work with manifest v3 on Firefox (but not on chrome).
This means that all manifest v3 extensions made for Chrome work with Firefox, and almost all manifest v3 extensions made for Firefox will work with Chrome.
They already support manifest v3, but with less restrictions than Chrome’s implementation.
Firefox’s implementation of manifest v3 is a bit different than Chrome’s, and still allows for blocking webrequests with no upper limit.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2024/03/13/manifest-v3-manifest-v2-march-2024-update/
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2022/05/18/manifest-v3-in-firefox-recap-next-steps/
He said torrent, not tor.
If they make one, you’d have to sideload it.
You can configure it per app. And choose your own block lists.
“it could happen here” posted in “world news” 😂
Yeah, because books, the web, and educated people have a liberal bias.
Revanced
Some developers will publish their apps on github, you can download it, and use a different app to get the apk file from the app you get from the play store, and compare the hash of the file. If they’re identical then Google didn’t meddle with it. If they’re not, either Google did, or the developer releases a different version to Google Play.
Very fitting!