Very unserious understanding of world politics.
Very unserious understanding of world politics.
Of course they’re viewed more positively in middle income than high income countries. The high income countries are all part of a global military alliance focused entirely on destroying communism and have fed their populations anti-communist propaganda for decades.
They’re one the main geopolitical adversaries of the political block that all the rich countries have formed, whereas they are investing in and helping develop poorer countries.
It is an absolute laugh though that all the countries that destroyed the Middle East over the last 30 years think China is a threat to world peace.
Democracy is when everything sucks and gets worse every year while centrists keep eyeing Nazis as possible better allies than the left.
If you force the government to improve society in any what you’re an “authoritarian” (oooh, how scary. btw, I’m pretty sure “authoritarian” as a cudgel against the left that equates them to the right is against board rules).
Peaceful revolution is when you burn 48 people alive in a building while a mob of neonazis keeps them from leaving.
This is a good bit.
Why is it necessary to cancel all consular services for Ukrainian men if they’re so eager to fight? Are you sure the bloodlust and desire for battle you’re perceiving isn’t your own?
Different ways, I usually say boo-jwah, bur-jwah is also one I’ve heard though.
OK, so China has looked out for its own interests and created an economic advantage for a fraction of its own population.
If lifting hundreds of millions of your poorest into the middle class is just naked self interest, why are Western countries so unwilling to do it? Are they stupid?
The modern American fascist is too soft to hear dissenting opinions.
What type of society do you think would allow you to burn other people to death and string up their corpses? Is it one that you think would be an improvement over modern China?
As someone who wants the end of Western hegemony I have to say: do it
Oh yeah, I knew about that part but I think I assumed the defederation would stop all visibility in both directions, and I guess they can see us but are hiding from us, like, as you say, cowards.
Could a told you that 2 years ago when Boris Johnson sabotaged the peace talks so his masters in DC could benefit from Russia remaining at war.
EDIT: I guess I don’t understand completely Lemmy, because some lib is calling me a Russian troll under this comment and I can’t see it unless I go to the original/non-hexbear post.
Well American civilization has been deliberately constructed to require cars for survival outside a number of cities you can count on one hand and cars from US manufacturers are getting so expensive that even used cars are becoming unaffordable to large and growing segments of the population, so I don’t know that I care that Ford’s bottom line will be impacted.
Sure, as long as the US permits them to accept a ceasefire.
Probably just the anglo intelligence assets that pass for moderators over there removed all the cool comments. What can you do
Everyone knows what you meant, but it’s an ecofascist talking point, and doesn’t engender respect for you.
Damn you post this dumb thing a lot.
Wow that’s pretty damning, almost makes it seem like someone using this to shut down conversations by claiming media outlets are unreliable could be acting in bad faith. Like some kind of pro-Western, pro-Israel ideologue.