Bethesda is guilty of not giving away their game for free? I really hope I’m misunderstanding what you are trying to say.
Bethesda is guilty of not giving away their game for free? I really hope I’m misunderstanding what you are trying to say.
I LOVED the original Delta Force game. Still have fond memories. Second was pretty decent too. All went downhill from there.
This looks more like Battlefield than Delta Force. Delta Force is meant to be tactical and realistic while still being accessible.
All fair points. I wasn’t trying to argue, just to have a friendly discourse :) My calling it a “game of magnitude” is obviously very open to interpretation.
For what it’s worth what I was trying to say was that this game has the potential to be unlike any game before it, so it’d be a shame to miss out on it just to avoid a minor hardware upgrade. But that in itself is of course also subjective. Suffice to say I myself won’t be missing out… :p
To each their own of course, but out of the 4 games you named in your comment I would definitely rank BG3 on top on a scale of “market disruption”.
That said this is all highly subjective of course. One person’s game of the year is another person’s biggest disappointment.
I’m guessing one of those is Baldurs Gate, but I’m struggling to think of two more. There’s been some decent games for sure but none other that I’d put on the same scale. Diablo 4 had the potential but squandered it imo.
Yeah that’s fair. It might even be worth waiting a year so the community can fix all the bugs :p I know I’m too impulsive to wait that long though. Played through Cyberpunk at launch and loved it!
Sure. And of course it remains to be seen whether Starfield is worth it, but it’s undeniable that a game of this magnitude isn’t a common occurrence. If they realize the game’s potential, then missing out on it because of a relatively inexpensive hardware upgrade seems like a shame.
You do realize storage drives aren’t exactly expensive?
Gotcha… From reading all the responses, it sounds like the word and meaning itself isn’t really objectionable, it’s more the people that use it. Which isn’t something a search engine tells you… 😅
Lol… it definitely reminds you of how old you’re getting. But I’m sure the generations preceding ours felt the same.
I’m getting old … what does this mean and why is it objectionable? Google suggests it means they have strong character, which seems like a fair assessment.
I think your original question stands. Self-hosting != federation.
So it’s basically just the climbing part of Tomb Raider games plus some exploration and narrative? To each their own but the climbing parts were always my least favourite. It’s also why I couldn’t get into the Jedi games. It just feels unrewarding cause of how on rails the experience feels.
Curious if this sets itself apart somehow or if that’s really all it is and it’s just not for me.
No new map, no new hero, no real meaningful change. Just skins and questwatch, which is literally just you unlocking audio clips and… not much else.
Oh and the three new “gamemodes” is just an arcade mode with 3 ways to queue up.
What a joke.
Nowadays, when I see news about some new law that’s gonna ruin the web I just have a sad chuckle. That ship has sailed. And they didn’t even need shitty laws to do it.