You’re using the meme wrong. The “at home” needs to be worse than the “mom can we get?”

Rust

Pretty happy with my solution today. I took my time today as it was a bit of a slow day and did it in Rust instead of python. Having proper Vec2 types is very nice.

use std::{collections::HashMap, error::Error, io::Read};

use glam::{IVec2, Vec2};

fn permutations_of_size_two(antennas: &[Vec2]) -> Vec<[&Vec2; 2]> {
    let mut permutations = vec![];
    for (i, antenna) in antennas.iter().enumerate() {
        for j in 0..antennas.len() {
            if i == j {
                continue;
            }
            permutations.push([antenna, &antennas[j]])
        }
    }
    permutations
}

fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error>> {
    let mut input = String::new();
    std::io::stdin().read_to_string(&mut input)?;

    let height = input.lines().count() as i32;
    let width = input.lines().next().unwrap().len() as i32;

    let antenna_positions = input
        .lines()
        .enumerate()
        .flat_map(|(y, l)| 
            l.chars().enumerate().map(move |(x, c)| (Vec2::new(x as f32, y as f32), c))
        )
        .filter(|(_v, c)| *c != '.')
        .fold(HashMap::new(), |mut acc: HashMap<char, Vec<_>> , current| {
            acc.entry(current.1).or_default().push(current.0);
            acc
        });

    let mut antinodes = vec![];
    for (_c, antennas) in antenna_positions {
        let perms = permutations_of_size_two(&antennas);
        for [first, second] in perms {
            let mut i = 1.;
            loop {
                let antinode = (first + (second-first) * i).round();
                if (0..height).contains(&(antinode.x as i32)) &&
                    (0..width).contains(&(antinode.y as i32)) {
                        antinodes.push(antinode);
                } else {
                    break;
                }
                i += 1.;
            }
        }
    }

    let mut antinode_count = 0;
    let map = input
        .lines()
        .enumerate()
        .map(|(y, l)| 
            l.chars().enumerate().map(|(x, c)| {
                if antinodes.contains(&Vec2::new(x as f32, y as f32)) {
                    println!("({x},{y})");
                    antinode_count += 1;
                    return '#';
                }
                c
            }).collect::<String>()
        )
        .collect::<Vec<_>>()
        .join("\n");

    println!("{map}");
    println!("{antinode_count}");

    Ok(())
}

My initial comment was a bit harsh, I’m sorry for that. It was meant to be a bit of a joke. Anyway here’s my code. Do note that I don’t do the challenges timed so I have a bit more time to name my variables accordingly. Takes 35 seconds to run on a pc with a AMD Ryzen 5 5600

import sys
from tqdm import tqdm


input = sys.stdin.read()

def all_operator_permutations(operator_count):
    if operator_count == 0:
        return [[]]

    smaller_permutations = all_operator_permutations(operator_count-1)
    return [
            *[['+', *ops] for ops in smaller_permutations],
            *[['*', *ops] for ops in smaller_permutations],
            *[['||', *ops] for ops in smaller_permutations],
            ]

def test_operators(ops, values):
    res = values.pop(0)
    for op in ops:
        match op:
            case '*':
                res *= values.pop(0)
            case '+':
                res += values.pop(0)
            case '||':
                res = int(f"{res}{values.pop(0)}")
    return res


total_calibration_result = 0

for line in tqdm(input.splitlines()[:]):
    target, *tail = line.split(':')
    target = int(target)
    values = [int(val) for val in tail[0].split()]

    all_perms = all_operator_permutations(len(values) - 1)
    ops = all_perms.pop()
    while True:
        res = test_operators(ops, values.copy())
        if res == target:
            total_calibration_result += target
            break
        if not all_perms:
            break
        ops = all_perms.pop()

print(total_calibration_result)

What a horrible way to name variables

Gnome is very different than xfce and has a different workflow. I find the workflow of xfce very nice and like the modularity of it

It’s pretty good. No justifying his behaviour tho

I just have all my active projects under $HOME/projects/ and projects from other people in $HOME/bin/

COSMIC. I was using Hyprland before but I wanted to try the alpha. I found it stable enough for my use-case so I stuck with it

I already use the cosmic alpha and it works great. No crashes so far, the only thing that has happend twice in 2 Months of using it is the screen locker did not display after waking up from suspend which meant I needed to go to a VT and kill cosmic-session