• 1 Post
  • 211 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • Yeah no disagreement.

    My comment was more being practical. IE the real world we live in. If it was not for conflict ( first ww2 then cold war ). Rockets and space travel would never have seen the funding needed to develop. This goes on the pretty much everything - GPS, communications, weather n and on. All of it was funded mainly due to the military.

    Without that it is hard if not impossible to imagine the wealthy considering the investment in tech worthwhile. And at the end of it. Real world the desire for the rich to protect or grow their position is the cause of all the above throughout history.

    Honestly, I’m not saying this is a good thing, it’s fucking depressing.

    But without war. I doubt the world would have moved past feudalism. There just would not be the motivation to change.




  • Yep. That is more about getting weight into space. As we know water can provide protection.

    But the issue of moving water from earth to space then building a 2 layered craft strong enough to surrou d passengers with a foot or more of water. While doable theoretically. Is just a huge huge task.

    If mankind is seriose about such. Robotic collection of ice from space is more practice. Moving it towards earth using it to create hydrogen and oxygen slowly via solar. Then using that to move the water itself into earth near orbit. From there building a vessel able to rotate and protect occupants from radiation etc would be possible.

    But seriosly the amount of work involved. Mars really is not the best place to go. Once humanity has developed the ability to generate graverty. Confirmed mankind can live is centrifugal generated enviroments. And developed to robotics to move ice and asteroids into orbit.

    Honestly building O’Neil station like structures would be healthier then trying to live in 1/3 g of Mars anyway. Mars is worth learning about. But musks population plan is not really the best way to make humanity less at risk of planetary loss.




  • Yeah im not an apple fan. (My brother would have a heart attack if I didnt say that. He loves them).

    But the fact they controll both hardware and software means they can run on lower specs. They dont use it as well as they could. But android having to allow others to develop hardware. Provides a bit more ability for manufactures to implement less efficient drivers. This is why some higher spec low value stuff seems so slow compared to equal speced cheaper Samsung stuff etc.


  • Well nowadays yes. But when the term smartphone was invented. Really not.

    The 1st iPhone was way lower spec then many high end phones of the time. Mainly Nokia but others as well.

    Early androids and others def had no specific specs that differed them from other high-end phones such as Symbian Win CE (as crap as the OS was but then so was the smartphone mareted version recreated later on)

    Seriously, marketing was the only thing that differed them from phones like the N95 and communicator etc etc.

    And as I mentioned, the locked store front. That really seem to be the main difference but really I still find non-advantageous myself.


  • As likely as this is. (not that Oxfam is exactly the scientific research org I look to for evidence. I do not have any reason to doubt)

    But it seems to me the top 1% is an easy target. When the huge commercial shipping to reduce labour costs and cheap plastic packaging etc used to handle it are equal if not a much larger overall cause of deaths.

    Just a much harder oner to argue for the change of, even if public opinion can actually have more effect.

    The top 1% have ignored public opinion since the invention of money. Commercial cooperation may try, but hiding or greenwashing is normally the closest they get.






  • High use Blender users tend to avoid AMD for the reasons you point out.

    This leads to less updates due to amd users not being to interested in the community.

    It is an issuw without any practicle solution. Because as I need a long overdue update. Again nvidia seems the only real choice.

    Everyone is sorta forced to do that unless we can convince amd users to just try out blender and submit results.

    So hi any AMD users who dont care about blender.

    Give it a try and submit performance data please.







  • I will add as a narrowboater.

    I found towpaths also have this issue with definition of surface.

    I am legally blind. (Some vision but bad)

    I have a few times tried to add more ditail to areas of towpath that will help the others like me know what to expect before mooring.

    Seems anything that improves this will help in your issues as well.