• eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It. Doesn’t. Matter. What. Firefox. Does. What part of google controls 3/4 of the web don’t you understand? If google puts it in Firefox has no choice, do it too or die. 5-10% of browsers not using it will not change anything except to lower that number to less than 1%.

    • Rayspekt@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well then it’s back to non-commercial platforms like here in the fediverse. The people who care about this stuff will find a way and those who don’t won’t care. Its more or less like in the days of the old web.

    • _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Google controls 3/4 of the web, so not only am I going to roll over and take it, but I’m going to lube myself up for their convenience.”

      FTFY

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Moving to firefox would still be rolling over and taking it though. If they don’t comply, you just don’t have permission to view the web page. It’s not like they’re going to go around that in any way.

        Unless you find an alternative to the website itself you’re out of options.

        The only ways of “not taking it” that I would see are either you find a way to ignore the DRM and view the site anyway, or you make the site drop the implementation, neither of which switching to Firefox does.

        • _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or just don’t visit websites that have DRM. Any website willing to work with Google on this DRM thing is a website I have zero desire to ever visit.

          • AnonTwo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That kindof argument is just naïve bordering obnoxious. It’s like an ostrich putting their head into the ground.

            It’s going to spread, more sites will use that DRM, and even if you decide you can keep off of them on principle, most people won’t.

            If it were remotely going to end up that way we wouldn’t have chrome being able to do this to begin with

        • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It makes it more expensive to implement the DRM. Companies always consider things in terms of return on investment. If implmenting it gains x, but loses y% share of users, they will weigh it up, the more %ge of users on Firefox, the more it will cost and the less likely companies are to roll this out.

          • AnonTwo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean…have you seen the gaming market on DRM? People point to arguments and research that it doesn’t even work and it still gets implemented in the AAA games…Firefox is going to need a lot more than outrage to build a share that threatens that.

    • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will because companies generally support anything above 5% otherwise they’re damaging revenue. Everyone needs to move to FF ASAP and don’t look back. Get all your friends and family on firefox.