ɐɥO@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-29 months agoI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzimagemessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1407arrow-down133file-text
arrow-up1374arrow-down1imageI hate that guylemmy.ohaa.xyzɐɥO@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-29 months agomessage-square85fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCatoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoThat seems to be mostly about monetization and commodification, which should already be absent from shitposting.
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoI get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
minus-squareInstigate@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·9 months ago I think he’d feel this similarly devalues it. I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance. Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoI mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoDid you mean “this” stance, maybe?
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoI suppose that would also have worked, but no.
That seems to be mostly about monetization and commodification, which should already be absent from shitposting.
I get that but I respect Watterson too much to assume his stance.
Well… which is it? Do you respect him too much to assume his stance or are you assuming he’d feel this similarly devalues it?
I mean I don’t want to assume he’d be alright with it therefore I won’t use it. Nothing I said was definitive, just what I think.
Did you mean “this” stance, maybe?
I suppose that would also have worked, but no.