• boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s pretty much…sexually suggestive pics of some teen anime girl

              • Chriszz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                I don’t really care I just find it hard to tell the age of a 16 year old anime character vs a 20 year old for example. They look the same. Children are different though and it’s pretty obvious when they’re a child unless they’re tall.

                • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah the distinction between the age of characters in their early 20s is pretty much nonexistent often. But as said its not even worth questioning it, the artist could roll a d20 for the age and it would be the same imagine regardless if the dice stops at 20 or at 1.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            Looks that way but eh, with anime girls there’s usually some backstory to pretend they’re adults.

            • VulKendov@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              An argument could be made that they are petite framed 18/19 year olds, but they could also be like 14 for all I know anime styles are kinda weird like that.

              • boonhet@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                By that rationale you can justify drawing just about anything. Could be literal babies. Doesn’t matter, not real people.

                • CookieJarObserver@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yes. It is. Its always just a drawing. Unless you can draw hyper realistic, they you could argue it perfectly resembles a actual person and therefore act similar to a photo.