Day 10: Pipe Maze

Megathread guidelines

  • Keep top level comments as only solutions, if you want to say something other than a solution put it in a new post. (replies to comments can be whatever)
  • Code block support is not fully rolled out yet but likely will be in the middle of the event. Try to share solutions as both code blocks and using something such as https://topaz.github.io/paste/ , pastebin, or github (code blocks to future proof it for when 0.19 comes out and since code blocks currently function in some apps and some instances as well if they are running a 0.19 beta)

FAQ


🔒 Thread is locked until there’s at least 100 2 star entries on the global leaderboard

🔓 Unlocked after 40 mins

  • AnanaceA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s a next if [...] to_visit.include?(off_p), and I also only visit points that haven’t been flood filled yet (next unless %w[. I].include? val), so there shouldn’t be any superfluous testing going on.

    Went back and did a quick test of thing, and yep, converting the to_visit array to a set pulls execution time down to ~600ms. But the code becomes much messier.
    Going to move the mutation of the map down to the point where I pick a point for visitation instead, so I can re-use the check for already flooded tiles instead.