• HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m an older GenZ born in the late 90s and I’ve had to show a few younger peers how to torrent recently.

    The idea of you needing a “special” program just for downloading a file seems to throw some of them off.

    I do know a few young people are tech/programming wizards but “generally tech savy” people seem to be declining. It’s either you’re really into it or barely know anything outside popular apps.

    One other thing I’ve noticed, People just seem to be more paranoid about downloading stuff not already installed on their devices. Which its good people give at least a bit of a shit about security but convincing people Firefox isn’t a virus gets a bit annoying (Yes I’ve had that conversation).

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      People just seem to be more paranoid about downloading stuff not already installed on their devices.

      I see this as a natural byproduct of Google, Apple, et al. “Walled Garden”

      They want you to consume only from them and only what they approve of. Granted Apple is far more on the latter side than Google but even Google fought tooth and nail to keep Epic from having their own store.

      I don’t interact much with people who are younger than me but I feel like the age of tinkering might not be as strong with them as it was for me. PCs were the predominant form factor and you could literally take it apart and put it back together with just a screwdriver. You can’t do that with laptops or phones at least not without a lot of other specialized tools. This isn’t their fault either since device manufacturers have really tried to make it difficult to do anything that they don’t control.

      Hell chrome is the best example of this. Google, whose business is selling your personal data for ads, is preventing the use of ad blockers. Firefox is mostly developed by Mozilla with a small handful of volunteers. It’s already showing signs of enshittification. We don’t have a viable third option.

      It will only be a matter of time before these tech companies start having brain drains due to their own greed.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        They want you to consume only from them and only what they approve of

        Not just that, I remember when app stores were new and people clamoured to be on them AND those app makers would often move to ONLY being on the app store, with anything downloaded off-store being a scam

        So a lot of people grew up to use these devices at a time where downloading something off the web was more likely than not to be malware, giving them the ick on the idea as a whole

        Fuck, I’m from the time a bit before all of that and even I have a goddamn hard time downloading shit that’s available off-store on someone’s website out of pure paranoia from those days

    • ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      i remember not using firefox for a rlly long time bc i heard it’s ram usage with multiple tabs open was a lot less efficient than other browsers. idk if that’s true but i use firefox w 4 windows with 20+ tabs each and have never had a problem

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        When tested with 10 tabs open, Firefox occupied about 960MB of memory, which is only slightly less than Chrome.

      • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        For awhile Firefox’s JavaScript engine used more memory, but those gaps have been mostly filled.

      • ericatty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I currently have 130+ tabs open in Firefox and 90+ in Chrome in addition to some other programs open and running (libreOffice, vpn, and others) Everything is working fine on my old laptop with an i5 processor and 16G ram and windows 10, ssd hd

        I can’t really game on this, and trying to run a virtual machine is a slog.

        But VS Code, database, xshell, calibre, audacity, photopea, even basic video editing all run fine. Granted I usually do one project at a time, so I’m not using VS Code and editing videos at the same time.

        The browser tabs are usually always open. Oh, and I actually just cleaned up my tabs. There were a lot more…

        I feel like the memory issues are mostly worked out now for most of us.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m an older GenZ born in the late 1900s…

      FTFY

      EDIT:

      Many of my Gen-X colleagues in tech (looking at you Stanford alumni) have been really into making sure their kids got into math, science and tech from an early age. So I think tech is going to be like medicine or law. Households with one or two parents in tech are more likely to produce tech savvy children by default. Everyone else will require effort.

    • spacedout@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why can’t browsers treat torrents as just another protocol for downloads, so that if you haven’t got a default set for torrent out magnet mimetypes, it just downloads it in the included download manager?

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Because then your browser would itself have to be a torrent client.

        The way torrents download is fundamentally different from how a standard http download works, which is why they have a specialist implementation. Browsers dont want to bother bringing a whole load of new code and associated bugs into the browser to do a job which isn’t really connected with the browser’s main responsibility, which is browsing the web.

        Just because torrents come from the web shouldn’t make it the browser’s responsibility to deal with them.

        • ayaya@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          You just reminded me there actually was a browser called Torch that could download torrents like a normal download. It was basically just Chrome with a built-in torrent client.

          I remember trying it out when it first came out in 2012. It never caught on and looks like the last release was in 2020.

          • Christian@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Opera had torrent support at the time I stopped using it, I never heard they had discontinued that feature but I’m assuming they did, both because it probably would have been mentioned in this comment chain already and also because making that decision should have been inevitable. I never used bittorrent before joining oink, I think I remember on joining thinking I would just use opera and then installing utorrent after finding out client whitelisting was a thing. Maybe I was already on oink when opera added the feature and I thought I’d try it because I was already using opera. Maybe this is all a fever dream, who can really say.

        • spacedout@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think pocket and quite the slew of unrelated features disagrees with you. Seems like most browsers are happy to be the everything app.

      • Berny23@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This would be terrible, because any website could potentially make you a seeder for „illegal“ content while normally browsing the web without a VPN. Meaning, your real IP address may accidentally be recorded by some lawerers and you’ll get a fine for whatever you accidentally shared (very dangerous, depending on country).

        There are already solutions for webtorrents, but at least these scripts can be blocked.

        • spacedout@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          No Herr officer, I was just trying to download my favorite distros, and I don’t know where all that Metallica/Disney/Nintendo came from.

      • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sure they probably could but they don’t really have the incentive to add support for them.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Brave does I think. I didn’t allow it to do so the one time I saw the pop up and I would not want that to happen unless I was always behind a VPN.

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I do know a few young people are tech/programming wizards but “generally tech savy” people seem to be declining. It’s either you’re really into it or barely know anything outside popular apps.

      I feel like we also got a new kind of guy, the tech-forward digital illiterate. They run most of everything.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The idea of you needing a “special” program just for downloading a file seems to throw some of them off.

      Just call it an “app,” that’ll shut 'em up.