Meh, that just killed my interest in the project. I was really looking forward to their first release. Now I don’t care anymore.
Familienvater, Tech- und PV-Fan (12,6 kWp/15,6 kWh), Elektromobilist, Gutmensch, ParentsForFuture, im Herzen grün
geboren um 333 ppm
Hinweis: AfD-Fans, Schwurbler, Putin-Fans, sonstige Leerdenker und Nappsülzen werden kommentarlos blockiert.
Meh, that just killed my interest in the project. I was really looking forward to their first release. Now I don’t care anymore.
The difference: I have higher expectations of Firefox.
If it is just as good as Safari, why should I use Firefox in the first place? I can use Safari right away if I’m forced to manually protect my privacy.
Bye, bye Firefox!
SAP still seems to do it this way.
I would prefer to let Bluesky die silently instead of throwing a life line.
„has been killed“ would be the proper wording
If it would be ha-capable it would be perfect. (At least on paper. )
I really need to try this.
As mentioned: It’s not the silver bullet solution but something that raises the bar for abuse. The reputational score is build up over time on the specific server based on the up- and downvotes you received.
So, yes, this can be abused itself as well - but it requires a lot more effort.
People may not like it but a reputation system could solve this. Yes, it’s not the ultimate weapon and can surely be abused itself.
But it could help to prevent something like this.
How could it work? Well, each server could retain a reputation score for each user it knows. Every up- or downvote is then modified by this value.
This will not solve the issue entirely, but will make it less easy to abuse.
Lots of words to say:
All browsers have horrible resource management. Chrome is bad. Firefox is worse.
I do not understand why it is standard that a single browser tab can eat up the full resources of the underlying hardware. And worse: The browser programmers do not even realize that this is a problem.
Well, I’m not that cheerful. Essentially, they changed one dictatorship for another. The elections where everything but democratic and Ortega is not any better than his predecessors. Just different.
Someone got cold feet, as it seems. I guess OpenSearch started to eat their lunch.
My guess: The reputation is already ruined and this change won’t make much of a difference.