Or maybe people don’t like being roped in with terrible people based on a part of them that they have no control over? Just a thought.
Or maybe people don’t like being roped in with terrible people based on a part of them that they have no control over? Just a thought.
Yes - it’s called my fucking electricity bill.
Famines happen regardless of political system.
This song makes me feel like I could throw a train into the sun
I don’t think you understand my point.
Let’s break this down by making up a hypothetical sexual history for the woman in question:
Guy 1 - Committed relationship, waited 3 months
Guy 2 - Casual fling, no waiting
Guy 3 - Committed relationship, waited 2 date
Guy 4 - Casual relationship, no waiting
Guy 5 - Hookup, no waiting
If, now that she’s seeing guy 6, she magically decides it’s time to be responsible and wait for a while. Any guy that has self respect isn’t going to tolerate that. Why is this new guy so different than than the previous ones? Why does she make him wait, but none of the previous men?
Anyone is going to figure that she is 1. Not attracted to him and is settling down after having fun to secure stability, or 2. Has cognitive dissonance about her past. A guy not accepting that and being skeptical of her intentions or level of honesty is fully justified.
And for the record, I apply my principles evenly between men and women. Casual sex is disgusting and a long sexual history is a sign of impulsive, irresponsible behavior or placing no value on your body or relationships. Man or woman.
Men don’t go for that because she didn’t make previous guys wait until marriage.
Making rules for those you “settle” for that did not previously apply is egregious hypocrisy.
Being an ugly woman is not nearly the struggle that being an ugly man is. Women who aren’t attractive need to approach at all and they’ll have more success than ugly men who approach twice as often.
I recommend arch to a first time user…once. because he said he wanted to have Linux as a new hobby of sorts. Everyone else I recommend Pop! Or Fedora most of the time.
Tried to use Manjaro at some point. What a horrible distribution.
Socialism is when people use tools to help complete a task?
History didn’t start on Oct 7th.
Fedora KDE. Just be sure to enable 3rd party repos (very easy and quick job, just a google search away).
KDE. I don’t have to change anything (other than taskbars on all monitors rather than just the main one) for an experience I like. Everything just works. Wayland support is best in class.
I don’t like gnome’s workflow and it takes COSMIC level customization for me to like it. And technical issues are common for me. Namely windows constantly spawning off screen and delayed reactions.
XFCE’s default layout is absolutely horrible and there’s no Wayland support. Mint XFCE’s implementation is good though.
Cinnamon, in my experience, is buggy and has similar technical problems to gnome.
I’ve used i3wm and it’s okay, but I would never use it on my main desktop. Takes a certain kind of workflow.
I’ve messed with AwesomeWM and can say it’s very ok.
LXDE/LXQT are obsolete. Not old school, obsolete. And in the case of QT, there’s absolutely no reason to use it when XFCE has the same ram usage anyway.
–
I haven’t used any other desktops other than these.
I’ve already paid with my data.
Want me to pay for a service (something I’m happy to do)? No ads and no selling of my data.
And no one uses it. The last time I used mumble was over a decade ago and its use was short lived.
Java is a hilariously bad platform for games.
Piracy is always good
It’s absolutely not. Use archinstall. The hardest part is preparing for breakages when you update.
Mint is considered the new standard for “it just works”, but I had nothing but problems on my desktop with mint.
If you believe you’re less likely to be in danger with a bear than a man, you’re just sexist.