My strategy with paywalls is to close the tab and go somewhere else. It works fine and is a great way to let the website owner this bullshit make them lose viewers and visibility.
My strategy with paywalls is to close the tab and go somewhere else. It works fine and is a great way to let the website owner this bullshit make them lose viewers and visibility.
I did one (or the AI did) in case you missed it and I think it’s pretty good.
I did the whole text in Yoda’s “style” of writing.
It doesn’t really misrepresent it. It shows you outdated pictures and move them very fast so you have the feeling it’s running smoothly.
Which could be acceptable in some solo games.
The shame of having people ready to elect MTG and Trump is way worse.
These people were elected. Remember that.
It could loopback to you…
the commercials that have already been paid to the company are still showing, so that ad revenue is still being capitalized.
That’s not how it works though. You are not accounted for watching the ads over a pirate stream…
Also people regularly spend more than they can afford.
When you think about it the fact that you can quite easily borrow money you clearly will not reimburse which is kind of an infinite money Glitch for capitalism.
Thanks ! That’s exactly how I think it could be implemented but that confirms that this is certainly not something you can find commonly where I live.
That confirms the fact that if you use the same wifi and everyone has entered the same encryption key then there is no real client isolation…
It’s cool that wifi keeps evolving. It comes a long way from the WEP beginnings.
Do you have any documentation on how this work ? Is there a name to this special protocol? Is it a recent addition to the wifi standard ?
Again a wifi AP doesn’t send data to a specific client. So how does an AP can enforce that one client can’t read a frame for someone else that is properly authenticated? How would an AP prevent someone spoofing mac addresses from receiving that data ?
I’m really confused by this feature I never heard of even when I was playing with aircrack and so on. Yes sometimes your mac address can get filtered but even that is not really difficult to avoid.
Sorry I have so many questions but I honestly did quite some “tinkering” with wifi years ago and none of this sounds familiar.
I like turtles.
Thank you for understanding.
I have no idea what this client separation is.
As far as I know there isn’t really any client separation on wifi. It’s a shared medium.
At least I don’t see anything preventing you from reading someone else traffic. So anything unencrypted on a wifi is also accessible to any other clients.
I had tools more than 10 years ago that could automatically hijack session cookies on wifi for anybody connected and not using https.
Edit: I know, I shouldn’t give a shit. But writing a fairly long comment to share my knowledge on this only to see it immediately downvoted without any explanation kind of sucks. So I’m removing this comment and will not interact here anymore.
* in 360p.
Just want to point out that the allergic person seemed to have taken every precautions possible to avoid this. She asked the waiter and the chef multiple times to verify that the allergen wouldn’t be there and they repeatedly said it was the case.
I think there were 4 times where they confirmed that the meal was safe. It wasn’t at all.
So it looked like a really really bad mistake from the restaurant staff.
Also if you put “sensitive” information in your history by mistake you can use “history -d <line#>” to remove it.
Unfortunately I had to use this command too many times.
Not OP but everytime I used the verbose output of ssh it didn’t help me one bit. Even adding outrageous verbosity I was still quite confused on what step failed and which didn’t.
I’m probably just bad at understanding SSH but i don’t know it seems like ssh workflow includes many trial and error until it finds a way to connect.
Imo the verbose output of SSH is often not very helpful if you don’t know very well ssh in the first place. Obviously it is still worth a shot and a good advice but don’t expect ssh to clearly state what is going on :)
They are the best cables!
A soft layer outside then some crunchy shielding and then another soft layer and crunchy core. This is clearly a snack.
I’m not a cat (nor a lawyer).
But discrediting someone’s opinion by just posting this meme is NOT toxic ?
So it’s toxic to assume someone might be a Russian bot but it is not toxic to disregard the opinion of everybody that said that ? You know there are bots online. Maybe not much here but there was definitely many on Reddit. So bots are real but someone that points out a bot must be wrong.
This is weird.
They built the stage around the cube.