• 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlNo thanks China!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Id be surprised if all admins of every instance that’s federated with Lemmy are all on the same page, let alone looking for narrative driven bots.

    I see “Ukrainian combat footage” with hundreds of upvotes and no comments, there was also an article speaking positively about facebook that had lots of upvotes and no comments (it’s in my history of you look, because I commented lol) - those look like red flags to me







  • Did you read that link you posted? Lmao

    If you get past the first paragraph, suddenly there’s really no praising and they talk about how bad health care is in Cuba and how many try to defect as they are forced into horrible conditions.

    From that article:

    “He said, “We were placed in slums with a high level of violence, under constant monitoring by the Bolivarian brigades [political police], who are supposed to offer protection but also report any suspicious activities and assure that we carry out our `revolutionary’ duty, indoctrinating our patients to vote for Chávez. If we refuse to do so we are sent back to Cuba.””





  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldTitle
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but I’d rather not have the mods remove anything - it’s the ol’ “how do we fact check the fact checkers” conundrum.

    One instance of an object or subject, can be viewed completely differently relative to your position in space and time. The observations of how something is functioning can be completely different from one observer to another, yet they can both be correct at the same time.

    So how exactly do you tell the truths from the untruths without proving intentional manipulation in the first place?





  • You asked me what source I need to want full trials for a vaccine. You have the wit of a teenager.

    mRNA hasn’t been used in a vaccine like this before.

    30 years in the scheme of things is still absolutely nothing. We had lead in our gasoline and our drinking water pipes for decades without anyone actually understanding the issue, and just trusting “it’s all safe!”

    Virus comes out and we pump out a fully produced vaccine in MONTHS. Of course it’s safe and tested fully /s


  • Right because injections and washing your hands are comparable.

    The “source that told me” was a bit of critical thought and common sense. This was a vaccine with tech we’ve never used on massive populations before, pushed by political leaders, followed by media outlets and gov leaders trying to paint everyone who questions it as if they’re the worst people humanity has to offer. Ofc we need extensive trials for a vaccine like that (or any vaccine), especially when the producers of the vaccine are immune from liability.

    Do you remember what informed consent is? If you’re injecting stuff into you, without fully understanding what either the virus itself can do, or what the vaccine can do, you’re just blindly following people.

    It’s this same mentality and confusion that lead to our current opioid pandemic. Blind trust in our institutions and leaders


  • You’re going to get covid. Vaccine or not.

    Get the vaccine if you’re elderly or have underlying risks, otherwise doing 3 shots a year to stay up to date doesn’t look very beneficial anymore.

    We didn’t know how ineffective the vaccine was in the beginning, but our leaders still said things like “This will protect you. Fully. Everyone needs to have it”. I’ll provide links if you didn’t see any of that going on.

    It was a lot more political than it was scientific, which is a huge red flag.