To be honest i wont be suprised if they add like a automatic deceased notice like this.

Let me guess? CLOUD VMS? “Emulation” tries the most generic app: Doesnt work. Office apps will be the only functioning apps.

About https://codeberg.org/ArtisanByteCrafter/pytube-gui/issues/7 Would it be ok if i try the playlist integration or do you want to do your things first?

Works pretty good but basic error handling is missing. I made a issue and a PR for it already. My first try at streamlit.

The group has moved on to beams now.

Sad Beam noises

But the worst too. As saaid many got new pets and ditched them after the lockdown. It could be some of them are from some shelters but many got ditched afterwards too

Yeah, the pandemic just gave us the best example why many people shouldnt get pets that require a lot of effort and time.

At the start of the pandemic many people got cats / dogs ( of course bought them not adopted them ;( ) because they were home and had time during lockdown. But after it was over they didnt had any time and gave it up for adoption.

Everyone needs to check if they have not just now time but in the future too and if they have the money to have the pet. And get yours best from adoption as this reduces the “intentional-pretty” breeding, that harms them ( for example pugs and their 24/7 breathing issue ).

Ironically the cheapest crap contains vegan stuff like wheat or rice. And cats ( at least my cat ) doesnt get so well with such things.

Here is the medal:

I did not remova any comments? Those removed comments are renoved by mods of the community.

But the issue is there is no other alternative that has an ordered and automatable access.

Then the other option was to have a community made “source” but that brings up the issue with “User x is not fit to contribute”, “Remove the bad rating on site xyz.com” etc. tadah back to the start with the “crying” ablut topic x.

We are still working on such an system as this could at least reduce the shitstorm about having no option to alter the rating. But its not final that decision.

No of course not, some were constructive and gave an alternative site or adjusted format how they expect it to look.

I just reflect how it feels to get such bad feedback without any real feedback in it.

Feedback includes many types of input but not: Disliking it because of personal opinion, because service x rated your favorite news page badly.

My feedback to that emotional feedback was just my emotion back to it.

If we wanted everyones opinion on MBFC yes then we would loved this response from you. But feedback is not just MBFC BAD!!!

What if theoretically give you feedback on your math test: “0 Points Because ITS BAD!!!” Then you would think why was it bad? The formula ? The results? The readability? Or were my books that i read bad?

“MBFC BAD DESTROY IT” isnt valid. Its just personal opinion. We responded to the real feedback accordingly and will implement them soon.

No, there was some good. Feedback, those “I HATE MBFC DESTROY IT” Feedback was not constructive.

That was sadly the point why we didnt recognized that as feedback, rather as just being childish because some site said some bad things about their favorite news page.

At least we got some real feedback that were constructive. We will implement those and deploy it.

Its called

Same thought here, why uploading it to proton drive? github isnt evil that they trying to snatch that code or whatever. If you are so cautious then ramp up a gitea or gitlab self hosted instance up.

And you are the grammar end boss

Its the final boss.

You need to fight the windows update!