• SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    200
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you ever feel useless just remember somebody designed and implemented the share-to-facebook feature on porn sites.

    • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      151
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That isn’t there so people use it. That is there so that Facebook can track where you go

    • DarylDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      No man. That is a brilliant feature that has caught out many “anti-gay” politician’s.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wanted to prove people used those buttons, but maybe not (need to use better/unblocked terms I suppose):

      Low Stakes Conspiracies: that share button is there to get users banned. Activist admins or funded by Musk himself?

      (Yeah, they pulled a permanent Twitter Taylor Swift on Pornhub.)

      Proof 404 (2003)

      • lewdian69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        I didn’t believe you but can confirm this blank search within the Facebook app. Instagram, by the same parent company, has lots of results though. Guess all the puritanical boomers are on Facebook not Insta

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          I wouldn’t be surprised if there was some sort of “shadow ban” style component to this. I think Tumblr does something like that where postsand tags that are marked as sexually explicit can’t be found by searching for them, but if you’re following the person, you can see them.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you’re ever depressed about building useless software just remember - leveraged buyouts are a thing. You could buy your company for nothing by just putting massive debt in the company account and actually manage it right.

      Well, in theory, in actuality this piece of accounting bullshit is reserved for vulture capitalists that will destroy the value of the company and asshats (see: Elon Musk) that will destroy the value of the company.

      Capitalism destroys everything that we build!

      • mcmoor@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well unless you somehow able to liquidate more money than the debt, the lender is the fool. The original founder practically got an exit that all startups wanted, you get the cheated money, but the lender gets nothing. You have to be able to fool someone into this position first.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh certainly. I’m sure Elon Musk is totally going to pay that loan back. It’s impossible that he bought out Twitter just to be able to ban people who pointed out how much of an asshat he is. Also, Trump somehow keeps getting loans and he’s loses more money every month than most of us make in a decade - that’s the sort of savvy businessman you can trust.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s a pretty hot take saying that on the internet considering the Internet got its start as a government program. Hell, a lot of the fiber in the US was done through corporate welfare programs. A lot of rural places wouldn’t even have Internet if it weren’t for our taxes going to the common good (like socialism!). Let’s not forget all the things that came out of NASA and government funded universities.

          He’ll, I like a bit of capitalism. A well regulated market that promotes competition can be fantastic. But to say almost everything came from capitalism is either ignorant, willfully stupid, or so full of propaganda that you can’t possibly be a functional adult.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah it’s obviously as much of a hot take as it is to say “capitalism destroys everything”, which is what I was responding to.

            I’ve grown up in a well regulated market economy, probably one of those countries the American right wing would call communist because, hey, you get a free education and health care, so I’ll be the first to acknowledge the role of the state.

            The problem with most of online is that it’s seen through American lenses. When most people say communism they mean free healthcare and when most people say capitalism, they mean robber-baron free-wheeling markets without unions where cash is king and lobbyist are seen as a healthy part of government.

            I’d like to be someplace in the middle please.

            But bear in mind I was reacting to someone saying “capitalism destroys everything” and I mean, for Darwin’s sake, look around you. Almost everything I can see and touch has been delivered by a for-profit business operating in a capitalist society (one that for me has always, and should always, be well regulated).

            I’m 46, married for 16 years, 4 kids and held a steady job since 18. I’ll leave it with you to decide if that’s a functioning adult or not. But thanks for getting personal, that really elevated the debate.

            • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you don’t want it to get personal then don’t fight common Lemmy hyperbole with what is known to be a talking point of the “everything that I don’t like is communism” dude bros.

              Hell , I agree with everything you said. I like what you said. Seeing someone with my exact views that comes from a place where it happens warms the cockles of my heart. Maybe in the sub cockles. Maybe in the liver, maybe in the kidneys. Maybe even in the colon, I don’t know.

              Maybe I’m a little sensitive because I live in a place where what you said is the lie we’re told every day. I watch the kind of people who say it and wonder when they’re going back to jail for meth or stealing a car. I go back to my hometown and watch the people there say that through their single tooth and really believe it. They can’t get better mouth bone care because they can’t afford it, but they’re sure robber barons will fix it.

              So if I came off as an ass, I apologize. I deal with those people every fucking day of my life and have for over 4 decades.

            • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              At the same time capitalism has built almost everything we have.

              Almost everything I can see and touch has been delivered by a for-profit business operating in a capitalist society

              There’s a couple ways to interpret these statements.

              Are you talking about innovation, progress, invention? Realistically, no. Occasionally capitalists put enough resources in the right hands that somebody working under capitalists manages to invent something good, but most real innovation doesn’t happen without government funding. Capitalists are very hesitant to risk their capital on the kind of critical R&D that is necessary to make progress. Even when it happens under capitalism, there’s no reason to think that capitalist control of the market caused it to happen - any system that gives creative people the time and resources to work on things will have as good results, at least, and it’s easy to construct a system that gives that time and resources to more creative people, with fewer bosses interfering and squashing anything that’s not seen as profitable. Capitalism is, though, very good at capturing and controlling innovation, sometimes even just killing existing innovations outright - see “embrace, extend extinguish”.

              Are you talking about manufacture and delivery of final products? Sure, under capitalist systems, of course it’s all done by capitalism, as other options aren’t available, or at least, aren’t given any room. If somebody builds a fence around the lake that everyone fishes in, and takes over the fish and sells them to people who used to catch their own, do you praise that person for providing fish? Do you think landlords are providing housing?

              Capitalism isn’t just commerce. Capitalism is an antidemocratic economic trait, where the production and distribution of goods, services, and information is controlled by unelected, private owners of capital. Does it “destroy everything we build” as the person you were replying to said? No, not everything, but it does destroy a lot, and control and pervert most of what’s left.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I will admit I was being rather hyperbolic - capitalism isn’t all evil… but our current brand of capitalism is evil as fuck.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Who’s “our”? If you mean the American brand of capitalism, oh yes, that’s not a society I would prefer to live in.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’d probably generalize it to “western” but yea - the modern greed driven society that America loves.

  • Nunya@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    11 months ago

    Pulse SMS App for Android recently updated to include:

    New “Discover” Section: Find new offers, inspiring content, articles & more

    On a messaging app, really??? Who wants any of those features when trying to message someone?

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    11 months ago

    You don’t understand! If you don’t keep adding new features, people will stop using your app!

    Who wants simple apps that just work as intended, am I right?

    • UFO@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      We’ve created an economy where that is not sustainable.

      This fact is bad imo, but it’s where we are.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The actual problem is if you don’t add new features, there’s nothing for people to do beyond maintenance and you aren’t going to keep good developers to only stick around for that.

      So your option is new features or a new app entirely, but coming up with other good apps isn’t easy and is a huge risk.

      So if you actually did good market research and spoke to users, you could find new features to add.

      Beyond a tiny company or sole developer, it doesn’t really work.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Get out of here with these facts and work on that UI redesign we’re due to ship next year.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You mean the one that no one asked for, makes it harder to do the primary thing the app is designed to do, and all the involved developers have told management it’s a bad idea with a detailed list of why?

  • zaphod@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    As a former product manager where the CEO led the sales team, I feel seen.

    • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      The board’s job is to hire the CEO and demand good value for shareholders. The CEO’s job is to make the big decisions to achieve that goal quickly and then usually leave before their short term thinking falls apart. The manager’s job is to enforce whatever decisions the CEO makes, even if it is stupid or cruel. And the employee’s job is to suffer so that each layer above can look good to the layer above them.

      Not to say there’s no good people in the system. My manager for most of my time there was actually a good manager who felt that his primary job was to deflect away the shit that rolled down from above so we could focus on our work, but then he got laid off along with half my coworkers.

      I do miss writing software, but I really don’t miss working in the corporate world.

  • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    12*2 = 24 and today I went to the store to buy some bananas but the all the bananas were too ripe #banan #banana #bananas #banani

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      What are you talking about? David kicked kinda good while having hair, and Victoria was in a band called the Spice Girls despite being a set square haunted by the ghost of a rice cracker.