• Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just wait till the F-16 sorties start.

    You won’t be able to swing a cat in here without hitting a whining tankie symp.

    • nekandro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      86
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same F-16s that were outclassed by the J-17 in recent military exercises?

      Pakistani pilots are on record saying the F-16 is worse in basically every way compared to a design China considers to be “budget” and “outdated.”

      • popcap200@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        74
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s pretend for a minute that it is actually better. Russia doesn’t field the J-17, so it doesn’t matter.

        • ours@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Also, there’s the airframe and then there are the missiles you put on it. Depending on what these F-16 load up with can make a whole lot of difference.

          I doubt they’ll be doing much dogfighting. The challenge will be to get in the air, fire off missiles, and land back without getting shot down.

          Edit: Oh and another thing that makes a lot of difference is radar assets. I bet those F-16s are going to get extended eyes and ears thanks to NATO AWACS flying high but within NATO borders.

        • nekandro@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          35
          ·
          1 year ago

          China recognizes that the J-17 is outclassed by the Su-34, so it sort of does matter…

        • nekandro@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          1 year ago

          The J-17 was designed for the Pakistan Air Force. Any other operators (Myanmar, Nigeria?) are operators of convenience.

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            40
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see, so the Pakistani Airforce which commissioned the design and production of the J-17 reports that it is superior to the F-16…

            Whatever helps the copium taste better I suppose.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Uh source?

        JF-17 is a multirole attack aircraft, F-16 is a multirole air superiority fighter.

        PAF has been very adamant that nothing they have tried compares to the F-16 in performance. Their last air skirmish was an F-16 that shot down an IAF MiG-21 in 2019. Even the J-10s they recently bought are still considered inferior.

        The real joke here is expecting an F-16 to actually reach Ukraine lmao. Pakistan had to basically play double agent to convince the USA to even open F-16 sales. There’s a 0% chance they’re going to give Ukraine F-16s for free, or even let them be leased from other countries.

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Background: On 22 December, Ukrainian defenders shot down three Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers on the southern front.

    Dude… its been three fucking days. Unless the drop in air sorties went from dozens down to zero and stay that way for weeks to a month, this means absolutely nothing.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      True to you. Strikes were reported as irregular, combing in intense series whenever Russia wanted a bigger impact. Saying just a couple of days of lesser bombing means it made an impact is too optimistic. They could’ve prepared ammunition for another bigger strike. But journoes need to write news somehow?

    • zephyreks@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbh on second thought it probably should. I haven’t seen any confirmation of any downed Su-34s, which you’d think Ukraine would be extremely eager to post.

  • nekandro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    106
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ukrainian Pravda is basically a propaganda outlet. Why is a mod posting this lmao

        • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They can have their failings, for sensationalism’s sake, but I don’t remember them posting pure masturbatory propaganda. It’s your average news outlet, and usual country-specific biases apply, but nothing Onion-like to see. If anything, let it sit for a day before reacting if it feels too weird.