• a2800276@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For some reason, I wouldn’t touch “free” from Oracle with a barge pole…

    • astraeus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine relying on GraalVM for all your production workloads and then one day Oracle announces a renewed pricing structure for it. Of course that could never possibly happen /s

      • a2800276@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        … or they sue you for using their API … or doing something similarly impertinent.

        :P

      • davewritescode@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know but Graal has always been kind of a licensing nightmare that feels designed to get you audited by Oracle. Most software organizations are trying to avoid paying ridiculous fees to Oracle.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    These releases will be available under the GraalVM Free Terms and Conditions (GFTC) license, permitting free use even for production deployments. Redistribution is permitted if not for a fee. For long-term support (LTS) releases such as GraalVM for JDK 17, Oracle will provide free GFTC releases until one year after the subsequent LTS release.

  • kenton@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just as shocking to me but after doing .NET Core dev (on my Mac) I can’t imagine going back to Java. .NET feels actually more modern (almost sane Scala-like)